[sslh] git repo?

[Yves Rutschle]

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 02:30:46PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Darn, I was hoping to just untar, cleanup, commit, repeat ;-)

Actually, that's probably what I'll do -- after checking it
out (so to speak), my SVN's history is of no value to
anyone, not even history.

> I don't like imposing my way on other developers, particularly with
> their own projects.  But if you've been considering making the jump, I
> can say it would make patch submission a *lot* easier. <nudge, nudge>
> 
> If that 'probably' turns out to be a 'yes', just yell.  I do quite a bit
> with git.  Yes, that rhymes, and no it wasn't intentional.  :)

I only do a lil bit with git, but yesterday I wished I could
stash, so I'll fire up bash and enjoy git's hash (which is
sha). Ahem. :)

More to the point, question to the experienced user: is a
public HTTP repository OK, or is it much better to have a
git daemon? I strongly tend towards HTTP to avoid a new
service (and then I'd need to add git support to sslh...)
but I'm not sure that's not overly restrictive.

Cheers,
Y.