[sslh] sslh-v1.16.tar.gz updated on website recently ?

[Yves Rutschle]

Hi Aaron,

While preparing v1.17 I realised what happened here:

> I tried unsuccessfully to figure out where I got the idea
> that you weren't consistent. It must have been my own
> mistake. Sorry!

Yes archive name and directory name was consistent as v1.16,
but before that it was consisten as 1.15, 1.14... without
'v'. So v1.16 probably broke your scripts!

(and the 'v' appeared as a side-effect of getting the
version number from the git tag, which I quite like as being
pretty clean).

Y.


On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:01:39AM +0900, Aaron Madlon-Kay wrote:
> Hi Yves.
> 
> > I seem to have the 'v' consistently:
> 
> I tried unsuccessfully to figure out where I got the idea that you weren't consistent. It must have been my own mistake. Sorry!
> 
> -Aaron
> 
> 
> > 2014/12/28 3:46?Yves Rutschle <yves at rutschle.net> ????:
> > 
> > Hi Aaron,
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 04:53:23PM +0900, Aaron Madlon-Kay wrote:
> >> In the future, changing the file name when the hash changes would be great.
> > 
> > Noted!
> > 
> >> The only other (entirely unimportant) issue I could mention is that right
> >> now the archive name and the extracted folder name do not match
> >> (sslh-v1.16.tar.gz vs sslh-1.16: latter has no "v") so we have special
> >> handling. If you're going to choose one, it seems MacPorts by default
> >> assumes ${name}-${version} so you could drop the "v".
> > 
> > I seem to have the 'v' consistently:
> > tar zvft sslh-v1.16.tar.gz 
> > drwxr-xr-x yves/yves         0 2014-07-15 11:34 sslh-v1.16/
> > -rw-r--r-- yves/yves     18092 2014-07-15 11:34 sslh-v1.16/COPYING
> > -rw-r--r-- yves/yves      2458 2014-02-11 22:06 sslh-v1.16/Makefile
> > [...]
> > 
> > The 'v' comes from the git tags, which I think I'd rather
> > not change as they are consistent.
> > 
> > Y.
> 
>