[sslh] Latest commit breaks fork

[Yves Rutschle]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 01:32:14PM +0000, Matt Smith wrote:
> Yes I do use transparent proxying. I don't get any messages before or after.

I had a theory that it came from there... and realised that
transparent proxying doesn't work on my system (but I don't
think that's sslh's fault)...

I can't see an execution path that would go from getpeername
failing to the program stopping. I just pushed a tiny patch
to add file and line numbers to the error messages (I can't
believe I've never put that in), would you confirm which
getpeername it is that fails?

Cheers,
Y.