[sslh] sslh-v1.16.tar.gz updated on website recently ?

[Aaron Madlon-Kay]

I maintain the MacPorts sslh package and we would have had the same issue.
Luckily we were out of date (still on 1.13) until recently so there was no
problem.

In the future, changing the file name when the hash changes would be great.

The only other (entirely unimportant) issue I could mention is that right
now the archive name and the extracted folder name do not match
(sslh-v1.16.tar.gz vs sslh-1.16: latter has no "v") so we have special
handling. If you're going to choose one, it seems MacPorts by default
assumes ${name}-${version} so you could drop the "v".

-Aaron


2014年10月13日月曜日、Yves Rutschle<yves at naryves.com>さんは書きました:

> Ok, a question to all maintainers:
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> > > I guess I should have changed the file name after all :-)
> > Yes please, that cause untraceable issue to me.
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41643
>
> Right, I apologise for the mess, I had no idea you guys were
> all so paranoid (but thanks for keeping me in check!).
>
> What would you rather have now:
> - I replace the old 1.6 tar.gz and create a new one?
> - I leave things exactly as they are right now?
>
> (and obviously I'll never do that again!)
>
> Cheers,
> Y.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sslh mailing list
> sslh at rutschle.net <javascript:;>
> http://rutschle.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sslh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rutschle.net/pipermail/sslh/attachments/20141124/f721c9dc/attachment.html>